...

IPB

.

 
[Add Reply] [New Topic]
> About Discrimination Lawsuits, don't waste your time
Critter
post Jun 30 2004, 10:00 PM [ Post #1 ]


Christopher Paige
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 2362
Joined: 20-February 03
Member No.: 2



Many years ago in Philadelphia, a man broke into a Judge's home chased him around his house and shot the Judge dead.

The man who shot the judge was the father of a woman who had filed a sexual harassment suit in Federal Court in Philadelphia. The Woman's sexual discrimination lawsuit bounced around federal court for a number of years until the Judge (who was killed) decided that he was going to just dismiss it.

I personally was in a somewhat similar situation. I filed a lawsuit in Federal Court appealing a decision by a government agency on a racial discrimination complaint that I had filed. Although the law was that a trial was required, a Reagan appointed federal judge decided that he would just dismiss my lawsuit (his dismissal was reversed by the Court of Appeals). At this time, Brain damaged Ronald Reagan was the front man to an agenda to get a lot of even more conversative judges in the Federal Court system to "get rid" of discrimination lawsuits.

The fact of the matter is that if you are black there is no remedy available to you by filing a racial discrimination lawsuit. If you file an EEO complaint with the EEOC, the EEOC will do everything in its power to damage your chances of wining in Court. The EEOC will issue a letter saying that it found no evidence that you were discriminated against immediately after you file a complaint (assuming that they allow you to file a complaint). If you then file a lawsuit in federal court, the Judge will use the decision of the EEOC as grounds to get rid of your lawsuit because he won't want to be bothered with discrimination lawsuits.

The only people who stand any chance of wining a discrimination lawsuit are White Females charging sex discrimination/sexual harassment and Old White Males charging age discrimination.

the bias against racial discrimination lawsuits is so great that judges will even use decisions against you by unemployment insurance as justification for dismissing a racial discrimiantion lawsuit. Even though some states have passed laws trying to prevent employers from using UI decisions to get discrimination lawsuits dismissed, Federal Judges are under no legal requirement to go along with this intention.

If you are Black, it is highly unlikely that any Federal Judge in New York City will decide a racial discrimination lawsuit in your favor. In fact, I would not be surpised if ALL of the racial discrimation lawsuits filed in Federal Court in New York City weren't ALL dismissed within months of their being filed.
 
Go to the top of the page
[Off] [Card] [PM]
Critter
post Jul 7 2004, 09:53 AM [ Post #2 ]


Christopher Paige
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 2362
Joined: 20-February 03
Member No.: 2



The EEOC Is Not Into Racial Discrimination Lawsuits

The EEOC is a sheat government agency that no longer even pretends to investigate racial discrimination lawsuits.

If you go to the EEOC with the purpose of filing a racial discrimination lawsuit, they will do everything in their power to PREVENT you from doing so. If you somehow FORCE the EEOC to process a complaint charging racial discrimination, the EEOC will just write a letter to you and the employer you are complaining against saying that there is no evidence that you were discriminated against.

I am not joking.

The EEOC will do everything in its power to HURT you in court in relation to a charge of racial discrimination.

At one time, the EEOC PRETENDED to investigate racial discrimination complaints for about a year and then issued something called a "RIGHT TO SUE LETTER". But, I guess employers complained that even allowing the EEOC to PRETEND to investigate racial discrimination complaints wass too much.

the real reason, I feel, is that even though the EEOC was and has always been a waste of time, it was still possible for an employer to send some letter or document to the EEOC that a Person charging racial discrimination could use against the employer. Specifically, since all employers KNOW that the EEOC is a sheat agency, most of them don't care what they send to the EEOC or what they say to the EEOC (companies know that the EEOC is not going to do anything with with racial discrimination lawsuits.

However, when the person charging racial discrimination filed a lawsuit in court, that person was then able to get copies of all of the documents that the employer sent to the EEOC and use them against the employer is Court. In any case, the EEOC WILL hurt you if you go to them to file a complaint without a lawyer. NEVER EVER go to the EEOC without a lawyer, these people will not help you with a racial discrimination issue and they HURT your chances of winning in court. The EEOC will assign some BLACK WOMEN to interface with you (some BLACK WOMEN who they know will testify against you in court that your complaint was treated properly) and it will do everything in its power to HELP the company you are charging with racial discrimination


The press is reporting today about a Lawsuit the EEOC has filed against Morgan Stanley on behalf of White Females. http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/re...it_x.htm?csp=26

Morgan Stanley should use the fact that the EEOC only pursues Sex Discrimination complaints on behalf of White Females to get the lawsuit dismissed. Of all the EEO hires at Morgan Stanley and other investment banks in New York City, there are far more White Females than any other non-White Male group. Any case for an investment bank discriminating against White Females would prove discrimination against Black Women and Black Men because there are much more White Females at investment banks in non-clerical positions than there are Black Women and Black Men.

[b]With all of the sheat EEOC lawsuits on behalf of White Females, investment banks have to some day realize that White Females are more of a pain in the ass than Black Females and Black Men. Eventually, the investments banks have to realize that they can save a lot of time and money by filling their EEO quotas with Black Women instead of with White Females. And personally, I don't think that that day is very far off, since most investment bankers HATE White Females anyway.[/i]


The only actions I have ever heard of the EEOC filing against any investment bank in New York City has ALWAYS been on behalf of White Females. In the 15 or so years that I have been in New York City, I have never heard of the EEOC filing a complaint against a company on behalf of FEMALES, it has always been on behalf of WHITE females.

I read a report once on the racial make-up of investment banks and the report said that upper management of investment banks is about 99.99% White Males. The EEOC claimed in the report that most of its litigation has been on behalf of White Females because White Females are the ones going to the EEOC to complain about discrimination. Well, I would amend the EEOC's statement to say that discrimination complaints from White Females are the only complaints the EEOC allows to be filed (as the EEOC will literally attempt to PREVENT you from filing a racial discrimination complaint, I am not joking here, they will try to PREVENT you from filing a formal racial discrimination complaint).

The fact of the matter is that there is NO REMEDY for racial discrimination in the workplace because every company in New York City knows that there is no Judge in New York City who is going to rule in favor of someone charging racial discrimination. So, the whole process of racial discrimination complaints becomes one big joke. If you attempt to prosecute a racial discrimination complaint in New York City you will be laughed at every step of the way and there will be some BLACK WOMEN assigned to interface with you by the EEOC because the EEOC knows that it can rely on the Beauch to testify that SHE (a Black Women) didn't give you the run around because of your race.

The only possible chance you stand with a company disciminating against you is to:

(a) Hire a lawyer who will sue on your behalf; or
(b) find something the company is doing that is illegal and report the company to the authorities.

If you hire a lawyer to go to court on your behalf, you will pay a lot of money in legal fees and the only way you can come out ahead is if the Company decides to settle out of court. No Judge in New York City is going to decide a racial discrimination lawsuit in your favor. And, even if you get a Clinton appointee Judge who will decide a reacial discrimination lawsuit in your favor, the only thing you can get from winning a racial discrimination lawsuit is BACKPAY, any money you made after you left the company you accuse of discrimination is subtracted from your backpay award.
 
Go to the top of the page
[Off] [Card] [PM]
Critter
post Jul 7 2004, 09:57 AM [ Post #3 ]


Christopher Paige
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 2362
Joined: 20-February 03
Member No.: 2



EEOC OFFICE DESTROYED ON 9/11

The USA Today Article on the Morgan Stanley Sex Discrimination lawsuit reports that the EEOC's office was destroy on 9/11, too bad the useless fahkers weren't IN that office when it was destroyed.


In Re Organized Crime

There is a line in one of the Godfather movies in which Al Pacino's character says that his father, the mobster, is no different from a judge or a senator. His wife, played by Diane Keaton, says: "Judges and Senators don't go around having people killed". Al Pacino's character then says something to the effect "who's delusional now?".

The fact is that senators and judges do have people killed just like mobsters. The only difference is that Senators and Judges first have to go through this masturbation routine to present themselves to the public as doing something righteous and legal. Mobsters just kill people they don't like because they don't like them.

If organized crime wanted to get rid of Blacks in America, I think it would be done quickly and directly. The Senator/Judicial approach to getting rid of Blacks in America is slower and more deliberate because they first have to convince the public that they are dispensing justice, that they are righteous and that Blacks deserve to be terrorized because they are evil (in order words that they are doing God's work).

For more than 100 years of American history, Title 42 Section 1981 of the US Code held that Blacks had the same right to contract as Whites. Title 42 Section 1981 was used by Blacks against employment discrimination because the law provided for compensatory and punitive damages, something the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not provide.

It was exactly because Corporate America stood to lose a lot more money if sued by Blacks under Title 42 Section 1981, that Corporate America asked the Republican Party to change the law.

Corporate America wanted 100 years of American case law changed because they didn't want to pay compensatory and punitive damages to Blacks and the Republican Party CHANGED the law.

Let me repeat this. For more than 100 years in America, Title 42 Section 1981 was available to Blacks to combat employment discrimination until a CONSERVATIVE AGENDA, fronted by Brain Damaged (now dead, thank God) Ronald Reagan, was able to get enough CONSERVATIVE JUDGES on the Supreme Court to reverse the law.

Once there were enough CONSERVATIVE JUDGES on the Supreme Court, these CONSERVATIVE JUDGES deliberately selected an employment discrimination lawsuit that they could then use to justify reversing 100 years of US case law, specifically to PREVENT Blacks from being able to get compensatory and punitive damages in employment discrimination case.

I would remind you that Morgan Stanely just settled a sex discrimination lawsuit brought by White Females for $54 million dollars

There were enough Democrats in Congress to pass a law reversing the decision of the Supreme Court. But, all of the people who had discrimination lawsuits dismissed by Federal Judges after the Supreme Court changed 100 years of case law were NOT covered by the law passed by Congress reversing the Supreme Court. There then is a special group of people who had racial discrimination cases dismissed and who have no remedy at law because of a special period in American history in which a Political Party succeeded in temporary reversing 100 years of American Case Law (I am in that special group of people).

So far, Most Blacks in America are still under the delusion that only BAD Blacks are the targets of Racist Whites. The fact is that ALL Blacks in America are the target and every Black in America probably will eventually be a victim of the desire to do Blacks Harm. The Question then becomes, what happens when the Justice System is Not An Avenue for Remedy?

According to rumor, the right in the constitution that holds that Americans have the right to be armed is intended to be a check against a Government out of control. The theory, one assumes, is Government's fear of an angry armed public would be enough to keep Government in line. This brings us to Organized Crime.

In the movie 1900, which is about Italy, a rich landowner is so dissatisfied with the poor people working for him that he herds them all into a corral and starts shooting them. The Landowner is not arrested by anyone.

I hired an employment lawyer in Michigan many many years ago and he said something to me that I didn't understand at the time. I understand now that the guy was speaking in CODE, I don't know why, I guess because he was a lawyer, the guy didn't want to just come out and say what he really meant.

This lawyer kept advising me that it was best to file an employment discrimination lawsuit in State Court in Michigan, and wait six YEARS for a trial, than to file the lawsuit in Federal Court and get a trial in six MONTHS; because the Judges in federal court were very CONSERVATIVE. I could not understand at the time the logic in what this guy was saying. What was the logic in waiting six years for something that I could get in 6 months simply because more of the judges in federal court were Republicans.

I understand now that what this lawyer was really saying was that he knew that the Federal Judges were not "sympathetic" to people filing racial discrimiation lawsuits and that there was little likelyhood of us winning a racial discrimination lawsuit in federal court. It took me about 10 years to finally understand what this lawyer was actually talking about
.
 
Go to the top of the page
[Off] [Card] [PM]
Peter Everhard
post Jul 21 2004, 07:46 AM [ Post #4 ]


Advanced Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 194
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 25



White Females and Retirement Age White Males Are The New Blacks

A $54 million dollar sex discrimination lawsuit settlement HAS to mark the start of Corporate America's WAR against White Females. Even if there weren't CONSERVATIVE judges in the federal court systems, Corporate America would NEVER have been faced with a $54 million judgement in any racial discrimination lawsuit.

OUTSOURCING is merely Republican Code for cannibalism. Corporate America has now turned on EATING its own (i.e. retirement age White Males).

Forget about all the sheat you've read everywhere about the reson Corporate American is suddenly into outsourcing. The REAL goal of OUTSOURCING is to eliminate Corporate America having to pay healthcare costs and retirement benefits to a gang of Old White Men. i read somewhere that the biggest fixed cost burden the auto industry faces is paying retirement benefits to retired autoworkers.

White Females and Retirement Age White Males Are The New Blacks In Corporate America
 
Go to the top of the page
[Off] [Card] [PM]
Critter
post Aug 3 2004, 12:09 AM [ Post #5 ]


Christopher Paige
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 2362
Joined: 20-February 03
Member No.: 2



USING THE JUSTICE SYSTEM TO GET JUSTICE

Some many years ago, this attorney told me that even though the EEOC was/is a useless gang of aholes (as far as racial discrimination lawsuits are concerned), it was still possible to USE them. This lawyer informed me that it was possible to "essentially" use the EEOC to conduct "discovery", i.e. it was possible to use the EEOC to get employers to say something or to submit documents that could be used against the employer in court. I think this is pretty much where the concept of USING a legal proceeding for purposes other than what it was intended (and/or purposes other than what may be apparent) began for me.

I once filed a racial discrimination lawsuit against a company and conducted a videotaped deposition of my former supervisor in which I questioned him about his homosexuality. I have a videotape of this dumb fahk answering questions about his homosexuality WHILE the dumb fahk was working in a job that required a security clearance. I am willing to bet that such a video tape carries more liability for this dumb fahk than my losing a racial discrimiation lawsuit carries for me.

The simple fact is that ANY legal proceeding carries with it a degree of liability for a company because almost any legal proceeding against an employer involves that employer either, testifying under oath or, submitting documents which can become public. With every statement and every page of evidence a company discloses, there is the potential that that statment or page of evidence can be used by other people against the company in other proceedings. So, while pursuing a racial discrimination lawsuit in and of itself is a fahking waste of time, pursuing a racial discrimination lawsuit is the perfect COVER for getting an employer to dig a hole for itself, a hole that can be used by someone else to hang the company (or which can be used in a criminal proceeding against the company).

I wish I could say that I was so clever that I pre-planned this little boomerang action I am about to describe, but the fact is that it just happened this way without any planning on my part.


First, I filed a racial discrimination lawsuit in Federal Court against this employer. At the same time, I filed for unemployment insurance benefits. The employer, fully aware that there was no chance in hell that a Federal Judge was going to decide for me in any racial discrimination lawsuit, ignores the unemployment insurance hearing and concentrates on getting my racial discrimination lawsuit in Federal Court Dismissed.

Well, the company DOES in fact get the racial discrimination lawsuit in Federal Court dismissed, but I win the administrative unemployment insurance proceeding.

[i]Federal Judges are very quick to dismiss racial discrimination lawsuits in federal court and it seems clear that they believe that they are HURTING the person filing the lawsuit. However, when a lawsuit is DISMISSED in federal court without a hearing, NO ISSUES are decided. In other words, while having a racial discrimination lawsuit dismissed is clearly intended as a HARM, all it essentially results in is COSTING the employer money, because no issues are decided. In fact, in theory, if a lawsuit in federal court is dismissed, you can, in theory, sue the empoyer in state court, since no issues were decided, and use all of the testimony and documents that the employer submitted in Federal Court against it in state court).

Any way, as I said above, while the Federal lawsuit I filed against the employer was dismissed, I won the unemployment insurance administrative proceeding. As a result of this, the only LEGAL JUDGMENT in existence concerning why I lost employment with the employer was a Judgment in my favor from unemployment. I was then able to use this judgement in my favor in a subsequent proceeding which resulted in my getting $20,000 (an amount larger than I would have been entitled to had I won the Federal Lawsuit, as the employer continued to pay me after my employment ended and I had very little to zero lost wages).

When the employer realized the STING, it tried to retroactively get the State Department of Labor to reverse the unemployment insurance decision, but it was too late. The layers WON the lawsuit but I got the money.

The above clearly demostrates how there can be JUSTICE when the JUSTICE SYSTEM doesn't work. I think it also proves that evolution will win out over some stupid little men's club.
 
Go to the top of the page
[Off] [Card] [PM]
Critter
post Aug 5 2004, 01:45 PM [ Post #6 ]


Christopher Paige
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 2362
Joined: 20-February 03
Member No.: 2



Predatory Behavior

In all things relating to racism in the Workplace, the Core assumption with Racist Aholes is that our only goal in life is to be some Ahole's At-Will Employee.

As we have said many times on this site, no one in Corporate America is prepared for the Predatory Employee, no Company in America is prepare for the concept that someone could be in their workplace with their own personal agenda. And,

The one fact that is guaranteed to turn every single employee in the workplace into a predator is employment at-will.

On the day that the working public in America realizes what employment at-will is and what it actually means, then every employee will come to the realization that their personal agendas are more important that the agendas of whatever *hit company they are currently working for.

The decision Corporate America has to make is:

Is the right to be able to fire workers at any time for any reason important enough to risk having a workplace full of predatory employees?
 
Go to the top of the page
[Off] [Card] [PM]
[Add Reply] [New Topic]

2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



... Time is now: 15th September 2019 - 03:02 PM
Tempcity (tm) Drama NYC (tm) Temp Agency New York City NYC Temp Agencies NY Temporary Employment Agency
Tempcity Hot Temp Agencies (tm) temp agency NY New York City NYC Temp Agencies Chicago Washington DC
NYC Temp Agencies Sheilaless TV Temping 247
Gay Marriage LLC, gay marriage limited liability company
Civil Union LLC civilunionllc.rllc.com
gaymarriagellc.rllc.com gaymarriagelimitedliabilitycompany.rllc.com
YouTube - Harlow Cuadra
www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGGUEoPrw4g
Dailymotion - Harlow Cuadra in Action - a Sexy video
DomesticPartners LLC (tm)
Harlow Cuadra Live! also harlowcuadra.rllc.com
harlowcuadralive.net harlowcuadramovie.com
Hot NYC Temp Agencies
sheilaless.com sheilaless.net sheilaless.tv
honation.com honation.net tempsters.com
mattfondel.com matthewfondel.com matthewmarionfondel.com